Join for free

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

2015, Vol. 33(iv) 391 –398

© The Writer(s) 2015

Reprints and permissions:

sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav

jpa.sagepub.com

Exam Review

Exam Review

Schrank, F. A., Mather, N., & McGrew, K. Due south. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Accomplishment. Rolling

Meadows, IL: Riverside.

Reviewed by: Victor Villarreal, The Academy of Texas at San Antonio, TX, USA

DOI: x.1177/0734282915569447

Test Clarification

General Description

The Westwardoodcock-Johnson Four Tests of Achievement (WJ Four ACH; Schrank, Mather, & McGrew,

2014a) is an individually administered measure containing tests of reading, mathematics, written

language, and academic knowledge. Areas of reading, mathematics, and written linguistic communication each

include tests of basic skills, fluency, and application. Academic cognition includes tests of sci-

ence, social studies, and humanities. The test authors note that the WJ IV ACH can be used to

help with determining an individual'southward bookish strengths and weaknesses, diagnosing specific

abilities and disabilities, and educational planning (Schrank et al., 2014a). When used in con-

junction with the WJ Iv Tests of Cognitive Abilities (WJ IV COG; Schrank, McGrew, & Mather,

2014) and the WJ Four Tests of Oral Language (WJ Iv OL; Schrank, Mather, & McGrew, 2014b),

it can as well be used to evaluate variations between an individual'south achievement and cognitive and

linguistic abilities. Estimation of WJ IV exam batteries is based on the Cattell–Horn–Carroll

(CHC) theory of cognitive abilities (run across Schneider & McGrew, 2012).

The WJ 4 ACH was published by Riverside in 2014; the previous version, the WJ III Tests

of Accomplishment (Woodcock, McGrew, & Mather, 2001), was published in 2001. In that location are seven

new tests in the WJ Iv ACH; however, it no longer includes tests of oral language abilities as

these are now published separately. Examiners should take knowledge of exact WJ Iv ACH

administration and scoring procedures; graduate-level grooming in educational and psychological

cess is recommended (Schrank et al., 2014a). The test may be administered to individuals

from age ii to over ninety years. Most of the tests in the WJ 4 ACH require 5 to 10 min to adminis-

ter; even so, some require xv to twenty min.

Specific Clarification

The WJ IV ACH contains ii test batteries. The Standard Battery contains 11 tests; in that location are

3 alternating and parallel forms (A, B, and C) of tests in this bombardment. The single version of the

Extended Battery contains nine tests. Notably, Tests 1 through 6 are considered the core set of

tests and are required for calculating intra-accomplishment variations (Schrank et al., 2014a).

Administration of the WJ IV ACH yields up to 22 cluster scores for interpretation; tests in the

Standard Battery form fifteen cluster scores, and administration of the Extended Bombardment provides an

boosted 7 cluster scores.

7 reading clusters are available. The Reading cluster is a measure of reading decoding and

reading comprehension. The Broad Reading cluster is a measure of reading decoding, reading

569447JPAXXX10.1177/0734282915569447Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentExam Review

enquiry-article2015

at UTSA Libraries on August 12, 2015 jpa.sagepub.com Downloaded from

392 Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 33(4)

speed, and reading comprehension. These first two clusters can be calculated by administering

the cadre set of tests. The Basic Reading Skills cluster measures sight vocabulary, phonics, and

structural analysis. The Reading Comprehension and Reading Comprehension–Extended clusters

measure comprehension, reasoning, and vocabulary. Reading Fluency is a cluster that measures

prosody, automaticity, and accurateness. Reading Rate measures automaticity with reading at the

single word and sentence levels. Notably, the WJ IV ACH includes clusters that were not nowadays

in the WJ Three ACH, including Reading Comprehension–Extended, Reading Fluency, and Reading

Charge per unit. Run into Figure i for a listing of the names of the WJ Four ACH reading clusters and the tests that

contribute to them.

Four math clusters are available. The Mathematics cluster provides a measure of problem

solving and computational skill. The Wide Mathematics cluster is a measure of problem solving,

number facility, automaticity, and reasoning. These first two clusters tin can be calculated past admin-

istering the cadre gear up of tests. Math Adding Skills is a cluster that measures computational

skills and automaticity with basic math facts. Math Problem Solving measures mathematical

knowledge and reasoning. There are no significant differences in the math clusters of the WJ Iv

ACH and the WJ III ACH. See Figure ii for a list of the names of the WJ 4 ACH math clusters

and the tests that contribute to them.

Four written language clusters are available. The Written Linguistic communication cluster measures spelling

and quality of expression. The Broad Written Linguistic communication cluster measures spelling, writing flu-

ency, and quality of expression. These showtime 2 clusters can exist calculated by administering the

core set up of tests. Basic Writing Skills measures spelling and identifying and correcting errors in

spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and discussion usage. Written Expression is a cluster that mea-

sures meaningful written expression and sentence writing fluency. There are no meaning dif-

ferences in the written linguistic communication clusters of the WJ Iv ACH and the WJ III ACH. See Effigy 3 for

a list of the names of the WJ IV ACH written language clusters and the tests that contribute to

them.

7 cross-domain clusters are available. Two of these clusters—Cursory Achievement and

Broad Achievement—are general academic proficiency clusters that measure performance in

reading, writing, and math. The Academic Skills, Academic Fluency, and Academic Applications

clusters contain tests of reading, math, and written language. Bookish Skills is a measure of

Test Cluster

Letter of the alphabet -Word Identification

Passage ComprehensionR eading

Give-and-take Attack Broad Reading

Oral ReadingB asic Reading Skills

Sentence Reading Fluenctwelvemonth eading Comprehensionb

Reading Call backaReading Comp.- Extended b

Word Reading FluencyaReading Fluency

Reading Vocabularya Reading Rateb

Figure 1. Woodcock-Johnson Iv Tests of Achievement reading tests and reading clusters.

aTests come from the Extended Battery.

bClusters require administration of tests from the Extended Battery.

at UTSA Libraries on August 12, 2015 jpa.sagepub.com Downloaded from

Examination Review 393

basic achievement skill, and information technology can be calculated by administering the core set of tests; Academic

Fluency is a measure out of overall academic fluency; and Academic Applications is a measure of an

private's ability to apply bookish skills to academic problems, and it can be calculated by

administering the core set of tests. The Academic Knowledge cluster provides a broad sample of

cognition in scientific discipline, social studies, and humanities. The Phoneme–Grapheme Knowledge clus-

ter provides information about basic agreement of sound/symbol relationships.

Scoring Organization

The paper Test Record booklet has built-in "Scoring Tables" that allow examiners to chop-chop

judge historic period- and grade-equivalent scores; however, these correspond general estimates, so scores

for estimation should be attained from the online scoring program (https://world wide web.wjscore.

com/). Access to this plan is provided with purchase of newspaper Test Records. In addition to

precise age- and grade-equivalent scores, the scoring plan tin provide percentile ranks, cog-

nitive-academic linguistic communication proficiency (CALP) scores, relative proficiency index (RPI) scores, W

scores, and standard scores. Examiners can also select normal curve equivalent (NCE) scores,

stanine scores, T -scores, z scores, and proficiency range (e.grand., boilerplate). Scores are provided for

tests and clusters.

Calculations of actual and predicted discrepancies and variations can also be attained from the

online scoring system. Using the WJ 4 ACH, an examiner can make up one's mind intra-accomplishment and

bookish skills/academic fluency/bookish applications variations across areas of reading,

math, and written linguistic communication. If used in conjunction with the other WJ IV exam batteries (i.east., WJ IV

COG and WJ IV OL), comparison procedures can be used to decide whether an examinee is

achieving commensurate with his or her current levels of cognitive and oral linguistic communication abilities.

Score reports tin be output in PDF, spider web page, or Word formats. The online scoring programme

indicates that it allows users to delete exam records. Yet, the delete functionality simply hides

the test tape; the record remains in the database and can exist restored if needed. Also, test records

must be "committed" to utilize the scoring organisation; after committing test record information (i.eastward.,

raw scores and observations ratings), users can access reporting and score interpretation but only

have xxx days to make changes to test data.

Test Materials

The WJ 4 ACH contains ii easel Test Books, an Examiner's Manual, the Technical Transmission on

CD, Test Record and Examinee Response booklets, an audio recording on CD, and scoring

guides. Examiners tin besides access a Study and Score Interpretation Guide through the scoring

Exam Cluster

Practical TroublesM athematics

Calculation Wide Mathematics

Math Facts FluencyM ath Calculation Skills

Number Matricesa Math Problem Solvingb

Figure 2. Woodcock-Johnson Four Tests of Achievement mathematics tests and mathematics clusters.

aTests come up from the Extended Battery.

bClusters require administration of tests from the Extended Battery.

at UTSA Libraries on August 12, 2015 jpa.sagepub.com Downloaded from

394 Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 33(4)

website; this brief guide describes dissimilar report elements that can be selected for inclusion in

the score report.

In the easel Test Books, assistants and scoring directions face the examiner and the

stimulus pictures and words face the examinee. Full general information and instructions specific

to each examination—including suggested starting points and basal/ceiling rules—are included in the

Test Books. The Test Books are user friendly; verbal test instructions are highlighted in a dif-

ferently colored font to assistance with standardized administration, and instructions are written in

a clear linguistic communication. The easel format limits the power of the examinee to see examiner

information.

The Test Record booklet is used to record identifying information, full general observations of

behavior (e.g., attention and self-confidence), examinee responses, and raw scores. It also pro-

vides basal/ceiling rules and includes icons that indicate required materials (e.thousand., stopwatch) for

each examination. This booklet as well includes Qualitative Observation Checklists for most of the tests in

the standard Test Book. The checklists for each test are different, and they provide helpful infor-

mation not available from the general test session observations checklist.

The Examiner'south Manual includes descriptions, specific administration information, and scor-

ing instructions for each test. It too includes reproducible examination-by-exam checklists that may be used

every bit a self-report or ascertainment tool; this is especially helpful for those learning to administrate the

WJ IV ACH, and they can as well serve as a structured ascertainment and evaluation tool for trainers.

Finally, the transmission includes the scoring guide for the Writing Samples Test.

Technical Adequacy

Exam Construction

Development of the WJ IV ACH incorporated multiple stages including a review and update of

the WJ Iii, creation of new tests and items, consultation with outside experts, and airplane pilot testing

and evaluation of items. Proficient consultants included experienced teachers, university faculty,

and psychologists; consultants assisted with new test and new item development.

Reviews and studies of the WJ III Tests of Achievement indicated that many subtests had

inadequate floors and ceilings (Bradley-Johnson, Morgan, & Nutkins, 2004; Krasa, 2007).

Notably, the authors of the WJ IV ACH annotation that one of the primary objectives of new item devel-

opment was to extend the range of items at the very low and very high difficulty levels. In addi-

tion, for timed tests, items were added to reduce the number of examinees who would finish the

exam earlier the fourth dimension limit. Adding new items besides served to increment the item pool to allow for the

formation of the three parallel forms of the Standard Battery.

Test Cluster

Spelling Written Linguistic communication

Writing Samples Broad Written Linguistic communication

Judgement Writing FluencyB asic Writing Skillsb

Editinga Written Expression

Figure 3. Woodcock-Johnson Iv Tests of Achievement written language tests and written language clusters.

aTests come up from the Extended Battery.

bClusters require administration of tests from the Extended Battery.

at UTSA Libraries on Baronial 12, 2015 jpa.sagepub.com Downloaded from

Test Review 395

Item Analysis

Items utilized in the WJ IV ACH were evaluated using the item response theory measurement

model. Specifically, calibration, detail pool equating, and scaling were accomplished through the

use of Rasch models (Rasch, 1980; Wright & Masters, 1982). Tests containing items that are

scored dichotomously were calibrated using the dichotomous Rasch model; those containing

multiple-point items were calibrated using the partial credit form of the Rasch model.

Good reviewers examined item content for potential bias for multiple groups of people (i.e.,

women, individuals with certain disabilities, and individuals from cultural or linguistic minority

backgrounds). Differential detail functioning was also evaluated to provide an empirical review of

item bias; in this case, items were evaluated by sexual activity, race, and ethnicity. All items flagged in the

differential particular functioning analyses were reviewed past the test authors to identify sources of

bias and, in most cases, were removed from final item pools.

Standardization Sample

A stratified sample was used based on projections from a U.S. Census Agency report from

2010. Depending on examinee age, samples were stratified based on census region, sexual activity, coun-

try of birth, race, ethnicity, customs type, parent educational activity, blazon of school, blazon of higher,

educational attainment, employment status, and occupational level. Data were collected from

7,416 individuals from geographically diverse areas and were divided into 4 major sample

levels. The preschool sample (ages 2 through 5 years) contained 664 children; the kindergar-

ten through twelfth-grade sample contained 3,891 examinees; the college/university sample

contained 775 graduate and undergraduate students; and the adult sample contained ii,086

examinees.

Comparisons between the WJ Iv norming sample and the U.S. Census projections were con-

ducted at the major levels. The norming sample distribution matched the census data closely;

all the same, individuals with higher education levels were overrepresented in the adult sample.

Examinee weighting was applied during the test norm construction to account for such discrep-

ancies; if an examinee belonged to a category that was overrepresented in the norming study

sample, the examinee'south partial weight for that variable was less than one.0, and vice versa.

Reliability

Internal consistency. Internal consistency reliabilities for all untimed tests with dichotomously

scored items were calculated using the split-half process based on odd and fifty-fifty items. Reli-

abilities for these tests were primarily in the acceptable to excellent range (.84-.94). For tests

containing multiple-point items, reliabilities were calculated from mean square fault values;

reliabilities on these tests were in the fantabulous range (.xc-.96). Reliability estimates for the WJ

Four ACH appear improved compared with those reported for the WJ 3 ACH (come across Bradley-

Johnson et al., 2004). In addition, reliabilities of WJ Iv ACH cluster scores (.92-.97) are higher

than they are for individual tests and run across minimum expectations for scores used to make

important decisions (Ysseldyke & Nelson, 2012), then cluster scores are recommended for

interpretation.

Test–retest. Reliabilities for speeded tests were based on a test–retest model with a 1 24-hour interval time

frame. In near cases, test–retest correlations were in the acceptable to splendid range (.83-.95),

indicating adequate test–retest stability. Reliabilities for speeded tests also appear to be amend-

ments over those from the WJ III ACH, and the reliabilities of cluster scores that include speeded

tests are in the acceptable range for making important decisions.

at UTSA Libraries on Baronial 12, 2015 jpa.sagepub.com Downloaded from

396 Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 33(4)

Alternative forms equivalence. As previously noted, tests in the Standard Battery are available in

three parallel forms. Items were selected for each form so that the item difficulty slope was

approximately equal for each and so that each independent equal representation of the intended test

content. Content-area curriculum experts provided consultation on the comparability of the three

forms, and equivalence was also evaluated by comparison test characteristic curves. Empirical

evidence supports the equivalence of the alternate forms.

Validity

Content validity. Content was designed to encompass core curricular areas and accomplishment speci-

fied in federal legislation. In addition to content review past the exam authors and content-area

experts, multidimensional scaling (MDS) was used as a supplemental empirical tool. MDS

provides information about content and processes underlying performance on diverse tasks;

the Technical Manual (McGrew, LaForte, & Schrank, 2014) provides detailed information on

the results of MDS analyses of the WJ IV tests, and results suggest adequate content

validity.

Construct validity. Reported intercorrelations betoken that correlations are higher amidst related

WJ IV ACH tests than among unrelated WJ Four ACH tests. Correlations are peculiarly loftier amid

related WJ IV ACH clusters. This is expected, as many of the clusters utilize the same tests. For

case, Test ane (Letter-Word Identification) is utilized in deriving scores for the Reading, Broad

Reading, and Basic Reading Skills clusters. Confirmatory multivariate statistical methods indi-

cated that reading and writing tests demonstrated moderate to loftier factor loadings on the CHC

Reading and Writing domain, supporting the validity of the reading and writing clusters. Moder-

ate to strong math test loadings on the CHC Quantitative Knowledge domain also provided valid-

ity evidence. Notably, factor analyses were conducted to encounter how private tests loaded on CHC

broad factors (run across Schneider & McGrew, 2012); factor analyses were not conducted to determine

how private tests loaded on WJ Iv ACH clusters.

Concurrent validity. Five studies examined the relationship between WJ Four ACH scores and scores

from the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement–Second Edition (KTEA-II; Kaufman &

Kaufman, 2004), the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test–3rd Edition (WIAT-III; Wechsler,

2009), and the Oral and Written Linguistic communication Scales–Westwardritten Expression (OWLS-We; Carrow-

Westwardoolfolk, 1996). WJ Four ACH clusters more often than not showed their highest correlations with the mea-

sures of the same KTEA-Two and WIAT-III domain composites. The WJ IV ACH written language

clusters demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with the OWLS-WE total score. Overall,

these correlations provide evidence of adequate concurrent validity. See the WJ 4 ACH Techni-

cal Manual for more detailed results of these analyses.

Clinical validity. The Technical Manual also provides results of a clinical validity study that exam-

ined the relationship between test scores and grouping membership status. Of particular relevance to

the WJ IV ACH is the test of test scores for examinees identified as having learning

disabilities (LDs) in reading, math, or writing. The LD-reading grouping was the only LD grouping

with mean reading test scores consistently below 80; in those instances where specific reading

exam scores were common across the three LD groups, the LD-reading group'due south mean score was

lower than the hateful group scores for both the LD-writing and the LD-math groups. However,

there were no clear-cut differences in scores in math and written language tests between the 3

LD groups. These results non only provide some additional evidence of validity for the reading

tests simply likewise demonstrate that interpretation of test information should be done in conjunction

with other relevant data.

at UTSA Libraries on Baronial 12, 2015 jpa.sagepub.com Downloaded from

Test Review 397

Commentary and Recommendations

The WJ Four ACH assesses cadre curricular areas and achievement specified in federal legislation.

The types of items and range of difficulty of tests seem appropriate for the stated population, and

information technology appears specially useful for determining the academic achievement of students at the primary

and secondary levels. The WJ IV ACH has been developed with a large, nationally representative

sample. Information regarding reliability and validity is detailed and meets minimum require-

ments for tests used to make important decisions (e.g., diagnosing disabilities).

A particular forcefulness of the WJ 4 ACH is that information technology has been co-normed with the WJ Iv COG

and the WJ 4 OL. This is especially useful for professionals conducting comprehensive evalu-

ations that require cess of multiple areas of functioning. Another strength of the WJ 4

ACH is that test materials are well structured and the repeated presentation of administration

procedures in the Test Books and Test Record booklet is helpful. The improver of Qualitative

Observation Checklists is welcome and may encourage examiners to be more thoughtful about

collecting observation data throughout testing. Finally, for evaluations conducted with school-

historic period children, the WJ IV ACH tests and clusters are now aligned with all of the reading, writing,

and math categories listed in the specific learning disability definition of the Individuals With

Disabilities Teaching Act (2004).

The WJ IV ACH too has some weaknesses. Although the authors state that it may be useful

for instructional planning, the WJ Four ACH provides only a broad sampling of achievement areas,

and the sample of skills is likewise express for comprehensive instructional planning. Moreover,

although the WJ IV ACH yields up to 22 cluster scores, it is important to note that most of the 20

WJ Four ACH tests are utilized in calculating multiple clusters; this results in especially high cor-

relations betwixt clusters in related areas (e.1000., reading) and suggests some redundancy between

clusters. In addition, although the WJ Four ACH has been normed on children every bit young equally 2 years

of age, many of the tests have inadequate floors for children in early childhood; examiners should

consider giving alternate tests when working with very immature children.

The WJ Iv ACH also has changes that examiners have to consider. First, those who have used

the WJ Iii ACH may be surprised to find that the tests of oral language abilities accept been

removed from the WJ IV ACH. This alter may be especially relevant to those working in

school settings where administering tests of oral language abilities are considered a typical office

of completing a comprehensive evaluation. Second, the complete shift to an online scoring and

information management system, while having benefits, may also crusade concerns about privacy and

confidentiality.

Despite these relatively minor limitations, the WJ IV ACH is a potent test and meets its stated

purpose. If used appropriately, and every bit a complement to other forms of psychological and educa-

tional information, information technology can certainly assistance with diagnosis of specific disabilities and can serve equally a general

evaluation tool to guide more narrow evaluations that can better inform intervention and educa-

tional planning.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(south) alleged no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the enquiry, authorship, and/or

publication of this article.

Funding

The writer(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this commodity.

References

Bradley-Johnson, S., Morgan, S. Yard., & Nutkins, C. (2004). Book review: The Woodcock-Johnson Tests of

Achievement—Tertiary edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 22, 261-274.

at UTSA Libraries on August 12, 2015 jpa.sagepub.com Downloaded from

398 Journal of Psychoeducational Cess 33(four)

Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1996). Oral and Written Language Scales: Written expression. Torrance, CA:

Western Psychological Services.

Individuals With Disabilities Teaching Human action, 20 U.s.a.C. § 1400 (2004).

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (2nd ed.). San

Antonio, TX: Pearson.

Krasa, N. (2007). Is the Woodcock-Johnson 3 a test for all seasons? Ceiling and item gradient consider-

ations in its employ with older students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25, 3-16.

McGrew, Yard. South., LaForte, E. G., & Schrank, F. A. (2014). Technical manual. Woodcock-Johnson Four. Rolling

Meadows, IL: Riverside.

Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago, IL: Academy

of Chicago Press.

Schneider, J., & McGrew, K. S. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan

& P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and problems (third ed., pp.

99-144). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Schrank, F. A., Mather, N., & McGrew, 1000. S. (2014a). Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement. Rolling

Meadows, IL: Riverside.

Schrank, F. A., Mather, N., & McGrew, K. Southward. (2014b). Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Oral Language .

Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.

Schrank, F. A., McGrew, 1000. S., & Mather, N. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cerebral Abilities .

Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.

Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler Individual Achievement Examination (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.

Woodcock, R. Westward., McGrew, Chiliad. Due south., & Mather, Northward. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Accomplishment .

Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.

Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. Northward. (1982). Rating scale assay: Rasch measurement. Chicago, IL: Mesa

Printing.

Ysseldyke, J., & Nelson, P. (2012). Assessment in special and inclusive education. In J. Banks (Ed.),

Encyclopedia of diversity in education (pp. 165-168). Yard Oaks, CA: Sage.

at UTSA Libraries on August 12, 2015 jpa.sagepub.com Downloaded from

... Raw scores ranged from 0 to 47 in the spring of preschool. The WJLW-IV has a reliability of .84 to .94 for children ages 2 to 7 years (Villarreal, 2015). ...

... Raw scores ranged from 0 to 21 in the spring of preschool. The WJAP-IV has also demonstrated loftier reliability (Villarreal, 2015). ...

The Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) is a widely administered measure out of classroom quality that assesses teacher-child interactions in the domains of Emotional Support, Classroom Organization, and Instructional Support. We use information from an evaluation of country-funded prekindergarten provided to 684 children from families with depression incomes (Mage = 57.56 months, 48% female person) to examine the extent to which Form scores vary over the class of an observational flow within a single day and investigate whether this variability is related to children's school readiness at the finish of the preschool yr, holding constant ii additional measures of quality. Teacher-child interactions in all three domains were moderately stable. Hateful Classroom Organization was positively related to math, and variability in Classroom Organization was negatively related to literacy. Mean Instructional Support was negatively associated with linguistic communication. Findings have implications for programs that utilise the Grade to make high-stakes decision and inform professional development.

... Three subtests of the Woodcock-Johnson 4 Tests of Achievement (WJ-IV) were used as assessments to compute the Academic Skills Cluster (Schrank et al., 2015): Alphabetic character-Word Identification, Spelling, and Calculation (meet Supplemental materials). ...

Children from low-socioeconomic status (SES) households on boilerplate exhibit lower academic achievement than their higher-SES peers. We investigated a novel hypothesis that differences in early-developing sensory networks—specifically the ventral visual stream (VVS), which is involved in processing visual stimuli—contribute to SES-related disparities in executive functions (EF) and academic outcomes. We used fMRI to investigate SES-related differences in neural office in children (half dozen–8 years, n = 62) during two attentional tasks involving attention to visual information: cued attention and memory-guided attention. Recruitment of VVS during both tasks was associated with EF and bookish accomplishment, and SES-related differences in VVS activation during cued attention were marginally explained by differences in cognitive stimulation. VVS activation during cued attention mediated SES-related differences in academic achievement. Finally, the link betwixt VVS activation during both tasks and bookish achievement was mediated by differences in EF. Nosotros extend previous work by highlighting that: (i) early-developing visual processing regions play a role in supporting complex attentional processes, (ii) babyhood SES is associated with VVS function, which is explained in part by SES-related differences in cognitive stimulation and (iii) provide preliminary evidence that individual differences in VVS function may play a function in the emergence of the income-achievement gap.

... International recommendations propose supplementing the standard psychometric evaluations-eastward.g., Wechsler (40), NEPSY (37), and KABC Two (59) scales-with exam batteries measuring academic skills. There are numerous Englishlanguage test batteries of this sort, including the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Second Edition (WIAT-II) (60), Wide Range Achievement Test−fifth Edition (WRAT5) (61), Woodcock-Johnson 4 Tests of Early Cerebral and Academic Evolution (ECAD) (62), and the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement-Second Edition (KTEA-Two) (63), taken to be the standard instruments. With the exception of the WIAT-2, normed with a limited sample of francophone Canadians, none has been calibrated for a French-speaking population (64). ...

Groundwork: Learning disabilities (LDs) are a major public health outcome, affecting cognitive functions and academic functioning for 8% of children. If LDs are not detected early and addressed through appropriate interventions, they have a heavy touch on on these children in the social, educational, and professional spheres, at great cost to social club. The BMT- i (Batterie Modulable de Tests informatisée, or "computerized Adaptable Exam Battery") enables fast, easy, reliable assessments for each cognitive domain. It has previously been validated in children ages 4–13 who had no prior complaints. The present study demonstrates the sensitivity of the BMT- i , relative to reference exam batteries, for 191 children with cognitive difficulties. Materials and Methods: These 191 subjects were included in the study by the 14 pediatricians treating them for complaints in 5 cognitive domains: written language [60 (cases)]; mathematical knowledge (xl); oral linguistic communication (60); handwriting, drawing, and visuospatial structure (45); and attention and executive functioning (45). In accord with a predefined protocol, the children were administered BMT- i tests first, past their pediatricians, and reference tests later, past specialists to whom the BMT- i test results were not disclosed. Comparison of BMT- i and reference test results fabricated it possible to evaluate sensitivity and understanding between tests. Results: For each of the 5 domains, the BMT- i was very sensitive (0.91–i), and normal BMT- i results were highly predictive of normal results for specialized reference tests [negative likelihood ratio (LR–): 0–0.16]. There was close agreement between BMT- i and reference tests in all domains except attention and executive functioning, for which just moderate understanding was observed. Determination: The BMT- i offers rapid, reliable, unproblematic computerized assessments whose sensitivity and agreement with reference test batteries make information technology a suitable first-line musical instrument for LD screening in children 4–13 years erstwhile.

... As part of the comprehensive assessments, youth completed the Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement (WJ-Ach) 1 . The WJ-Ach has demonstrated good to splendid content validity and concurrent validity with other accomplishment measures (Villarreal, 2015). The Broad Achievement blended, a measure out of general academic proficiency beyond reading, writing, and math, was used in the present written report as a measure of pre-COVID academic achievement. ...

During the COVID-19 pandemic, a major educational shift took place—the transition from face-to-face up instruction to remote learning. Although this transition impacted all learners, it is speculated that groups of vulnerable youth (i.e., those with neurodevelopmental disorders, in rural areas, from low-income families) would demonstrate meaning difficulties with remote instruction. Nevertheless, no work to date has investigated remote learning in these groups in rural settings. Appropriately, the aim of this study was to characterize remote learning experiences in youth with neurodevelopmental disorders from rural Appalachia. Forty-nine youth (ages 6-17 years) and caregivers who had previously completed a comprehensive psychoeducational cess were contacted to participate in an online study during COVID-nineteen stay-calm orders. Youth and caregivers reported on psychopathology, emotion regulation and coping strategies, remote learning experiences, and demographics. The majority (87%) of students in rural Appalachia were non receiving the recommended corporeality of straight remote pedagogy. Indeed, the majority of school services received pre-COVID were non continued during remote learning. Greater child emotion dysregulation and parent psychopathology were predictive of remote learning difficulties and less appointment. Youth's adaptive coping abilities were predictive of greater full schoolwork per solar day. Parent employment was associated with greater difficulty with remote learning, but IEP/504 status and family income were not related to remote learning experiences. Results identified intervention leverage points, including improving adaptive coping and emotion regulation abilities, and reducing parent psychopathology and stress, to better remote learning outcomes for youth in rural settings with neurodevelopmental disorders.

... During the T2 follow-upward, three subsets of the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement (WJ 4) were used equally assessments of academic achievement (Schrank et al., 2015): Letter of the alphabet-Word Identification, Spelling, and Calculation. Each examination presented the participants with items of increasing difficulty. ...

Childhood socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with numerous aspects of cognitive development and disparities in academic accomplishment. The specific environmental factors that contribute to these disparities remain poorly understood. We used observational methods to characterize three aspects of the early surroundings that may contribute to SES-related differences in cognitive development: violence exposure, cerebral stimulation, and quality of the physical environs. Nosotros evaluated the associations of these environmental characteristics with associative memory, cued attention, and memory-guided attending in a sample of 101 children aged 60-75 months. We further investigated whether these specific cerebral abilities mediated the association betwixt SES and academic accomplishment xviii months later. Violence exposure was specifically associated with poor associative retention, only non cued attention or memory-guided attention. Cognitive stimulation and college quality concrete environment were positively associated with cued attending accuracy, but not after adjusting for all other ecology variables. The quality of the physical surroundings was associated with memory-guided attention accurateness. Of the cerebral abilities examined, only memory-guided attending contributed to SES-related differences in academic achievement. These findings propose specificity in how particular aspects of early environmental experience scaffold different types of attention and memory subserved past singled-out neural circuits and shed lite on a novel cognitive-developmental machinery underlying SES-related disparities in academic achievement.

... The subtests that were administered from the WJ-III accept been retained in the WJ-IV, with similar administration and scoring procedures, except for oral language, which was removed. The main changes from WJ-3 to WJ-Iv (i.east., renorming and extension of items at low and high difficulty levels, to address floor and ceiling effects; Villarreal, 2015) would not be expected to significantly influence examiner administration or scoring errors. The KTEA-iii has retained all 14 subtests that were office of the KTEA-ii, and changes primarily involved extension of the age range of the test and the add-on of several new subtests (Breaux & Lichtenberger, 2016). ...

  • Gina L. Harrison Gina L. Harrison
  • Lauren D. Goegan
  • Sarah J. Macoun

This study examined the scoring errors beyond three widely used achievement tests (Kaufman Exam of Educational Accomplishment–Second Edition [KTEA-2], Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Achievement–Third Edition [WJ-3], and the Wechsler Individual Accomplishment Test–Third Edition [WIAT-III]) by novice examiners. A total of 114 protocols were evaluated for differences between the measures on the frequency and type of scoring errors. Within-measure analyses were besides conducted to identify particular composites or subtests that might be more prone to error. Amidst the three measures, the WIAT-III was found to have the nigh scoring elements and was, therefore, the measure out most susceptible to errors in scoring. Irrespective of the measure, more errors occurred on composites requiring greater examiner inference and interpretation, similar to previous studies on the propensity of scoring errors on cognitive measures. Results are discussed in relation to assessment fidelity and to assessment preparation practices.

  • Kesha N. Hudson
  • Michael T. Willoughby

The Canadian Niggling Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (Picayune DCDQ-CA) is a parent-report screening instrument that identifies 3- to 4-year-old children who may be at take a chance for Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). Nosotros tested the factor structure and criterion validity of the Niggling DCDQ-CA in a sample of preschool-aged children in the The states ( N = 233). Factor assay indicated that the DCDQ-CA was best represented by one cistron. Using cutoff scores that were proposed by the developer, 45% of the sample was identified as at-run a risk for DCD. Although a much larger percentage of children was identified as at-run a risk than would be expected based on the prevalence of formal DCD diagnoses in the population, the Little DCDQ-CA demonstrated good benchmark validity. Specifically, compared with their peers, children who exceeded the at-risk criterion demonstrated worse motor competence, executive performance skills, and early on numeracy skills and were rated as having greater ADHD behaviors past their teachers, all consequent with expectations for children who are at risk for DCD. Results are discussed as they relate to future utilize of the Little DCDQ-CA.

  • Kesha Northward. Hudson
  • Haley G. Ballou
  • Michael T. Willoughby

Previous studies have documented that individual differences in fine and gross motor skills are associated with executive function (EF) skills. This study used an experimental blueprint to test whether participating in cognitively challenging motor skills activities was causally related to improvements in motor skills and ii key indicators of school readiness: executive role and early numeracy skills. The motor skill programme involved fine and gross motor game‐like activities that were delivered in a small-scale group format. Activities were socially engaging and progressively challenged children based on their motor competencies. 50‐three preschool‐aged children participated in sixteen motor skill sessions across 8 weeks. There were significant treatment effects for all outcomes, such that children in the treatment condition exhibited significant improvements in motor, EF, and early numeracy skills, compared to their peers in the waitlist command condition. Treatment furnishings on EF skills were stronger for inhibitory control than working memory. Improvements in numeracy were most pronounced for children with initially lower levels of ability. Motor skill‐based interventions are an ecologically valid and developmentally appropriate approach for fostering school readiness skills in early childhood.

This report investigated the clan of timed visual processing tasks varying in levels of phonological processing with give-and-take reading. We tested 293 Chinese children on Cantankerous Out, Visual Matching, rapid automatized naming (RAN), and Chinese character recognition across three to five years. Children's character recognition at ages 6 and vii predicted Cross Out at ages 7 and eight. There was a cross-lagged relationship between character recognition and Visual Matching from ages 6 to 7. Still, only character recognition at age vii predicted Visual Matching at age eight. While RAN and grapheme recognition predicted each other from ages 5 to 6. Merely only RAN predicted subsequent character recognition from historic period half dozen to age 9. Results propose that learning to read Chinese promotes visual processing when a phonological component is not required in such processing, only conversion from visual codes to phonological codes predicts reading in Chinese.

Estradiol is known to play an important role in the developing human brain, but little is known on the entire network of potential regions which might be affected and on how these furnishings may vary from childhood to early adulthood, which in plow tin can explain sexually differentiated behaviors. Here we examined the relationship between estradiol, cortico‐amygdalar structural covariance, and cognitive or behavioral measures typically showing sex differences (verbal/spatial skills, anxious‐depressed symptomatology) in 152 children and adolescents (6‐22 years old). Cortico‐amygdalar structural covariance shifted from positive to negative across the age range. Estradiol was plant to diminish the bear on of historic period on cortico‐amygdalar covariance for the pre‐supplementary motor expanse/frontal eye field and retrosplenial cortex (across the age range), and for the posterior cingulate cortex (in older children). Moreover, the influence of estradiol on age‐related cortico‐amygdalar networks was associated with higher discussion identification and spatial working memory (beyond the historic period range), too as higher reading comprehension (in older children), but did not bear upon anxious‐depressed symptoms. There were no significant sexual activity effects on any of the higher up relationships. These findings confirm the importance of developmental timing on estradiol‐related effects and hint at the non‐sexually dimorphic role of estradiol‐related cortico‐amygdalar structural networks in aspects of noesis distinct from emotional processes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Quantitative knowledge (Gq) tin be defined equally the depth and breadth of knowledge related to mathematics. … It consists of acquired noesis about mathematics, such every bit knowledge of mathematical symbols .., operations (east.thousand., improver-subtraction, multiplication-partition, exponentiation-nth rooting, factorials, negation, and many others), computational procedures (due east.one thousand., long division, reducing fractions, the quadratic formula, and many others), and other math-related skills (east.grand., using a figurer, math software, and other math aids). (Schneider & McGrew, 2012, S. 127)

  • Nancy Krasa Nancy Krasa

This report assesses the adequacy of item gradients and ceilings for the subtests of the Woodcock-Johnson Iii (WJ III) Cognitive and Accomplishment batteries, including the Diagnostic Supplement, in their apply with participants ages 16 to 25 and Grades 10 to 18. Of the 52 subtests, 18 contain acceptable detail gradients and ceilings for the entire age and grade range. The remaining 34 sub-tests have inadequate ceilings and/or inadequate item gradients in at least the interval between the offset and second standard deviations above the mean, every bit predicted by the growth curves of the factor clusters, which top around age 25. The report discusses developmental and practical implications and suggests improvements for the next revision of the WJ.

Oral and Written Linguistic communication Scales: Written expression

  • Eastward Carrow-Woolfolk

Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1996). Oral and Written Language Scales: Written expression. Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services. Individuals With Disabilities Educational activity Act, xx U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).

Kaufman Examination of Educational Accomplishment

  • A South Kaufman
  • Due north L Kaufman

Kaufman, A. South., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Test of Educational Accomplishment (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.